
The role of the Director is the primary one in any production, even though the Producer might disagree with me. In fact the producer hires and sometimes fires the director, but it is the director's vision which drives the project though filming and editing to its final result. Sometimes directors are replaced during a project, usually due to difficulties between them and the producers, and almost always about budget. Sometimes the director's vision is changed completely during post production by the editors at the producer's insistence, again, usually because the producers think the film will do better financially 'their way'. We often see a 'directors cut' available on a DVD now, and sometimes they can be release years after the original. Ridgly Scott only released his preferred cut of his iconic film 'Blade Runner', many years after it's original release. The producers had insisted on a narrative voice over as they were concerned the audience might not be able to follow the plot. Mr Scotts version had no voice over and was considerably darker and longer. I loved the original with its homage to American Film Noir, but I also enjoyed the director's cut where the audience is left to discover the future world in its own time and without a guide.

When directing episodes for a television show, a director's responsibilities are somewhat diminished, as the visual look and feel of the series is already established, usually by the person billed as the show's creator or executive producer. Those directors who choose or are chosen to work in TV traditionally have had to accept that they will not be as lauded, or as well-paid, as their big-screen counterparts.[2]
I have yet to really experience directing film, although there was some element of directing with the process of the radio programme. I am really looking forward to next semester when I can get to grips with a camera and a script and really understand the mechanics as well as the art of it.


